A Closer Look at the Biggest Brazilian Community in the USA

 Studies show that immigrants are overqualified for low-level agricultural employment. Although they have the credentials, they are much more eager than the residents to accept those demanding, dirty jobs. For that bread, they are ready to bend their qualifications and go through challenges. These results emphasize the need of knowing the reasons behind migrants' desire to work but lack of the necessary employment. They seem to be caught in quite unfair dead-end employment. 

Employment attitudes compromise the equality of cultural capital.

This chapter will clarify what the most significant vibe of such findings is as well as how the qualitative results and information fit the theoretical framework, original questions, and hypotheses. You know, this chapter is really providing us the big picture and the truth on more significant events. It's all about really absorbing the special atmosphere and learning how the experience of farm migrant differs from the usual. I use different approaches to explain my idea of cultural clout equality since I am discussing when people use their cultural influence to advocate equality. OMG, studies have unequivocally shown that local employment markets in rural Scotland still depend on migrant workers from A8 countries (Bell et al., 2004, de Lima et al., 2005). De Lima and Wright, 2007; 2009. periodment. Research indicates that migrant workers are mostly hired for dirty jobs (Anderson et al. 2006, CAB, 2005, de Lima and Wright, 2009; Stalker, 2008; Hoggart and Mendoza, 1999); they are positioned in subordinate roles in the economic structure; they get unfairly low wages; and they encounter barriers to employment that use their cultural capital. Though they have mad qualifications, there is evidence that people are completely using cheap migrant workers since they can easily get jobs in the local labor scene for unskilled/semi-skilled gigs that are all dirty and hard (de Lima and Wright, 2009: 395). These changes seriously jeopardize the scene of equality and cultural capital for families. These difficulties include whether migrant workers are treated equally and their cultural capital is acknowledged or whether stigma drives exploitation of them. They also support a lot of claims made by agricultural migrants, you know?

The assertion for substantive equality is among the most well-known ones that probs have negative long-term effects on migrants' social and cultural transitions. 

In Chapter 2, I maintained that a claim based on cultural capital—also known as an equality claim—is a claim for substantive equality resulting from notable differences in people's resources, well-being, and recognition. All of substantive equality is about giving everyone a fair chance, so guaranteeing that there is no unfairness in our distribution of the good things, and appreciating group cultural coolness. Despite having mad qualifications and real cultural power, migrant farm workers in Scotland were performing unskilled jobs in the agri-/horticulture industry. To land those low-level jobs on Scottish farms, they neither had to prove their skills, credentials, or experience. Like, they were rather overqualified and so. Some of them flexed from polytechnic, college, or university. While some people aimed to progress their professions in other sectors and gigs, others graduated in agriculture and farming. Some of those who graduated from edgy colleges entered the private sector before traveling to the UK, while others decided to move to the UK, develop their talents, and land a good career. For instance, although working the same job as the residents, these researchers were adamantly against pay disparity. Like equal work, equal value—you know? Do you believe the local employees were becoming more irate than those working in the same location doing comparable or related tasks? Though the law says that equal pay is a worker's vibe, in many cases people fail to understand it.

OMG, legislators thought farmers and businesses valued migrants as integral members of their workforce and considered them as total leaders. 

To be honest, though, most of those asked did not feel they got the same degree of respect and advantages as others. Regarding contracts and employment, the specifics may vary for every person but everyone should be covered by the same fundamental terms and conditions. Whether you are a local worker or a farm migrant counts not at all. Farm migrants have a legal right to the same fundamental terms and conditions as equivalent workers, employees who perform the same work in the same workplace you know? OMG, the respondents absolutely hate their present employment situation. Work conditions, hours, time off, rights, and pay rates satisfy them nowhere. They seem to be not enjoying the same advantages as others, which is absolutely illegal and unacceptable. OMG, these results might cause some to think that employers and dubious recruitment companies are mistreating migrant farm workers. Simply said, it's not cool. An unethical farmer or employer who unfairly treats a worker can fully exploit them. Hey, it's absolutely not cool.